“ARSITEKTUR YANG BERBAGI”
Dewan Juri IAI Awards 2011 :
Imelda Akmal S. – Ketua
Prof. Yulianto Sumalyo, IAI
Ikaputra, IAI
Eko Alvarez, IAI
Isandra Matin Ahmad, IAI
Tan Tik Lam, IAI
Daliana Suryawinata
Momoyo Kaijima – Atelier Bow Wow
Winny Maas – MVRDV
Memutuskan penerima penghargaan IAI Awards 2011 sebagai berikut :
I. Karya Arsitektur
Dari 29 nominasi yang telah melewati Penjurian Tahap II Visitasi (12-13
November 2011) dan Penjurian Tahap III (15 November 2011) di UI Depok, terpilih
8 karya.
Kategori Hunian
Rumah 0 -200 m2 :
1. Rumah 51 – Jakarta : Sontang M. Siregar, IAI
2. Pori-pori House – Depok : Budi Pradono, IAI
Rumah 200 – 1000 m2
3. Rumah Gelagah – Depok : Sukendro S.P. IAI dan Jeffry Sandy, IAI
Rumah > 1000 m2
Tidak ada Penerima Penghargaan
Kategori Bangunan Komersial
4. Hotel Sensa – Bandung : Budiman Hendropurnomo, IAI
5. Taman Ahimsa Villa – Bali : Ketut Arte, IAI
Kategori Bangunan Umum / Publik
6. Kementerian Perdagangan R.I – Jakarta : Budiman Hendropurnomo, IAI
7. Surau Baitul Jalil – Sumatra Barat : Timmy Setiawan, IAI
Kategori Bangunan Konservasi
8. Waerebo – NTT : Gregorius Antar Awal, IAI
II. Karya Kawasan
Tidak ada peserta
III. Karya Tulis Arsitektur
Dari 9 karya yang diterima, hanya 4 karya yang memenuhi persyaratan
penjurian.
Penerima Penghargaan Pujian :
“Kota Masa Depan yang Aksesibel” : Harry Kurniawan – Kompas Minggu rubrik
Desain
IV & V. Arsitek dan Tokoh
Masyarakat/Instansi yang berjasa bagi arsitektur Indonesia
Penerima Penghargaan akan diputuskan kemudian oleh Dewan Kehormatan
IAI.
Acara pemberian penghargaan dan presentasi penerima penghargaan akan
ditentukan kemudian, bersama dengan pembuatan buku IAI Awards 2011.
Isandra Matin Ahmad, IAI
Ketua Panitia IAI Awards 2011
Sumber : iai.or.id
Thursday, December 1, 2011
The Holcim Awards 2011 for Asia Pacific Winners
By Alison Furuto
1st prize 01
1st prize 02
2nd prize 01
3rd prize 01
SOURCE: Cite:
Furuto , Alison . "The Holcim Awards 2011 for Asia Pacific Winners" 29 Nov 2011. ArchDaily. Accessed 01 Dec 2011.
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Multi Function Building at Kelapa Gading
Nama Proyek: Multi Function Building
Lokasi : Kelapa Gading- Jakarta Utara
Klien : disclosed
Status Karya : Proposal
Tahun : 2005
Bangunan yang berlokasi di utara jakarta ini mengusung konsep kontemporer;Bangunan ini berfungsi sebagai area pameran,meeting room dan gallery yang terdiri dari 3 lantai.
Monday, November 21, 2011
Profil diri, Visi, Misi dan Program Kerja Calon Ketua Umum IAI Nasional 2011-2014
Sumber : iai.or.id
Calon Ketua Umum IAI Nasional
Calon Ketua Umum IAI Nasional
 | Bambang Eryudhawan, IAI | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
 | Munichy B. Edrees, IAI | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Sunday, November 20, 2011
Bjarke Ingels Makes No Little Plans
Danish architect ready to leave his footprints in Manhattan and beyond
Technology, Education, Knowledge (TEK) Center in Taipei, Taiwan will house activities related to contemporary technology and media.
Courtesy BIG
Danish architect Bjarke Ingels, principal of Bjarke Ingels Group (BIG), has set his sights on the Big Apple. Since September, he has been jet-setting back and forth between his Copenhagen headquarters and his new Manhattan office in preparation for a closely-watched mystery debut.
Already an established member of the young architectural vanguard (with an icon of his own in the shape of a figure-eight-shaped housing complex in Copenhagen), Ingels told AN that he is prepared to take American real-estate development head-on: “Everyone has been warning us that it’s impossible to work with American developers—that they’re too profit-driven,” Ingels said. “But it’s really exactly the same with developers everywhere.”
While some architects balk at the idea of working with big-time developers, Ingels enjoys finding overlapping interests. In fact, Ingels is working on a new book tentatively called Bigamy, detailing this manifesto of inclusivism, much of which he said he sees all around New York. “It’s what America is all about,” the architect said. “Bigamy is a radical embrace of different interests and ideas. To accommodate instead of eliminate. America’s surf-and-turf is the best example of bigamy. Combining two opposite things into a new hybrid is really quite delicious.”
For Ingels, developer and architect can be allies. “People want nice apartments with good views, day light, and good public spaces. That’s also good marketing for a developer. When you increase the quality, you increase the value. We’re designing for overlap.”
After completing a series of large-scale residential blocks in Copenhagen, BIG’s first American commission pushes the boundaries further and appears tailor-made for sustainable-minded Ingels. Last year, the Durst Organization, developer of the ultra-green Bank of America Tower, invited BIG to evaluate a massive site along Manhattan’s West Side for a planned residential project. “Durst is really innovative, especially in terms of the sustainable highrise,” said Ingels.
BIG’s 57th Street project isn’t their first foray into North American architecture, either. Ingels worked on the Seattle Public Library while still at the Office for Metropolitan Architecture in the 1990s and is currently working on a high rise in Vancouver, a museum competition on the East Coast, and recently partnered with SOM on a proposal for the St. Louis Gateway Arch design competition (the Michael Van Valkenburg team won).
Ingels’ own big plans are to also go west: “Chicago hasn’t found its form yet, but we’re in talks with [developer] Dan McCaffery about a large, mixed-use New Urban waterfront development,” he explained. The project would be part of the four-billion-dollar, SOM-planned South Works, on the site of an old U.S. Steel plant.
While the physical forms of BIG’s designs can seem radically new, Ingels insists they are the product of continuous evolution rather than revolution. “I believe in the exchange of ideas over time. Revolutions are messy. You lose a lot of stored cultural knowledge by starting from scratch, and end up making the same mistakes anew.”
Ingels sees New York in its own evolutionary period brought about by financial and climate stress. “These crises are allowing for a reconsideration of the parameters that created a city like New York,” he said, pointing to the city’s advances in bike lanes, amenities like the High Line, and an initiative to plant one million trees as evidence of this shift. Already raring to go like a real New Yorker, the architect said, “We’re blurring the boundary between urban and suburban, and merging them into a hybrid that allows us to explore more interesting typologies.”
Ingels is keeping a closed mouth on further details about the anticipated 57th Street project. “All I can say is that 57th Street represents the marriage between the European courtyard building and the American skyscraper. But there’s a lot of room in there. Even if you know what the parents look like, you can’t tell how the child will end up.”
Source :www.archpaper.com
Already an established member of the young architectural vanguard (with an icon of his own in the shape of a figure-eight-shaped housing complex in Copenhagen), Ingels told AN that he is prepared to take American real-estate development head-on: “Everyone has been warning us that it’s impossible to work with American developers—that they’re too profit-driven,” Ingels said. “But it’s really exactly the same with developers everywhere.”
 |  | |
| At Mountain Dwellings in Copenhagen, dense residential living hovers atop a parking garage wrapped in metal panels depicting Mount Everest. [Click to enlarge.] Jens Lindhe and Jakob Boserup | ||
For Ingels, developer and architect can be allies. “People want nice apartments with good views, day light, and good public spaces. That’s also good marketing for a developer. When you increase the quality, you increase the value. We’re designing for overlap.”
 |  |  |  | |||
| Four views of BIG's 8 House in Copenhagen which incorporates multiple housing types around a landscaped courtyard. [Click to enlarge.] Ty Stange and Jens Lindhe | ||||||
BIG’s 57th Street project isn’t their first foray into North American architecture, either. Ingels worked on the Seattle Public Library while still at the Office for Metropolitan Architecture in the 1990s and is currently working on a high rise in Vancouver, a museum competition on the East Coast, and recently partnered with SOM on a proposal for the St. Louis Gateway Arch design competition (the Michael Van Valkenburg team won).
Ingels’ own big plans are to also go west: “Chicago hasn’t found its form yet, but we’re in talks with [developer] Dan McCaffery about a large, mixed-use New Urban waterfront development,” he explained. The project would be part of the four-billion-dollar, SOM-planned South Works, on the site of an old U.S. Steel plant.
 |  | |
| Brightly colored interior spaces at the VM Houses (left) and Mountain Dwellings (right). [Click to Enlarge.] Stuart McIntyre and Jens Lindhe | ||
Ingels sees New York in its own evolutionary period brought about by financial and climate stress. “These crises are allowing for a reconsideration of the parameters that created a city like New York,” he said, pointing to the city’s advances in bike lanes, amenities like the High Line, and an initiative to plant one million trees as evidence of this shift. Already raring to go like a real New Yorker, the architect said, “We’re blurring the boundary between urban and suburban, and merging them into a hybrid that allows us to explore more interesting typologies.”
Ingels is keeping a closed mouth on further details about the anticipated 57th Street project. “All I can say is that 57th Street represents the marriage between the European courtyard building and the American skyscraper. But there’s a lot of room in there. Even if you know what the parents look like, you can’t tell how the child will end up.”
Source :www.archpaper.com
How Architects Work in the Current Times
By.Baraona Pohl
Last week we were invited to the HP Designjet Launch and BIG’s House 8 Presentation. The experience was really striking, because being there with some other architects and bloggers, made us think about how work systems are changing so fast, that some times is difficult to even notice them until you find yourself inside that system, working and sharing information without any limitations.
That made us re-think about what social networks and web 2.0 are doing in the field of architectural production. All the new tools we’re discovering every day, make the practice more collaborative and open. Some months ago, we wrote in a guest post for Ymag:
Now communication is more dynamic and also it may be a little bit confusing because of that. With blogs actualized every single day and using social networks as facebook and twitter, architects may have a personal contact in between them, with the users of their buildings and also with researchers that are working on new materials and constructive solutions.
At that time, we were speculating and trying to describe the reality we found around us, but now, we can positive say that the architecture field, at least the firms working on projects in different countries at the same time, is taking advantage of all these tools to materialise ideas, as Bjarke Ingels [founder of BIG] showed at his presentation.
There are also two points we want to remark here, the first one is that we find amazing that some big companies, in this case HP, are providing their clients not only their products, but also a service using cloud computing. The ties in between users from different places help to create new ways of understanding the work-flow. With these new tools, now it’s possible to enable technical design teams to easily access, share and print large format project files online anytime, anywhere, as they pointed.
For the event, they not only invited traditional media but also hp a group of bloggers, including The Pop-Up City, Archimag, urbanophil, pwcom 2.0 and us; and also gave us the opportunity to meet “face-to-face” some other people that we were already following via twitter or facebook. The fact of thinking on bloggers to attend to this kind of events is a positive one, that brings to mind Javier Arbona’s question, when he asked: “Has a blog actually had a significant impact on a building in the process of being designed or built? What was the outcome?”
After the press presentation, we were invited to visit BIG’s House 8, that was released here at ArchDaily before, and also here you can find the work-in-progress videos. Bjarke Ingels presented the project and the book Yes is More. Here are some images about the House 8 in a cloudy day and some others about Bjarke’s presentation:
“What defines the Internet is its social architecture. It’s the living environment that counts, the live interaction, not just the storage and retrieval procedure.” -Geert Lovink, 2005
Last week we were invited to the HP Designjet Launch and BIG’s House 8 Presentation. The experience was really striking, because being there with some other architects and bloggers, made us think about how work systems are changing so fast, that some times is difficult to even notice them until you find yourself inside that system, working and sharing information without any limitations.
That made us re-think about what social networks and web 2.0 are doing in the field of architectural production. All the new tools we’re discovering every day, make the practice more collaborative and open. Some months ago, we wrote in a guest post for Ymag:
Now communication is more dynamic and also it may be a little bit confusing because of that. With blogs actualized every single day and using social networks as facebook and twitter, architects may have a personal contact in between them, with the users of their buildings and also with researchers that are working on new materials and constructive solutions.
At that time, we were speculating and trying to describe the reality we found around us, but now, we can positive say that the architecture field, at least the firms working on projects in different countries at the same time, is taking advantage of all these tools to materialise ideas, as Bjarke Ingels [founder of BIG] showed at his presentation.
DesignJet - HP
DesignJet - HP
For the event, they not only invited traditional media but also hp a group of bloggers, including The Pop-Up City, Archimag, urbanophil, pwcom 2.0 and us; and also gave us the opportunity to meet “face-to-face” some other people that we were already following via twitter or facebook. The fact of thinking on bloggers to attend to this kind of events is a positive one, that brings to mind Javier Arbona’s question, when he asked: “Has a blog actually had a significant impact on a building in the process of being designed or built? What was the outcome?”
House 8 - BIG
Rem Koolhaas on CNN, the end of the star architect?
By David Basulto
CNN’s Talk Asia just featured an interesting interview with Rem Koolhaas. At the beginning of the video we see the Prada Transformer in action.
Highlights of this interview are Dubai, which lead to Koolhaas talking about the public sector and the stimulus, and his views on the Generic City.
When talking about influence (Rem was on the 100 most influential people list by Time magazine in 2008) and “star architects”, Koolhaas sentences the term to death:
“I think it’s a name that is actually degrading to the vast majority of people it is applied to. And it really is a kind of political term that for certain clients is important because they use star architects. My hope is that through the current complexity that title will exit discretely and disappear”.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)